The "i" in team?

Its the day after the Mats Sundin free agency is over, and he's now a Vancouver Canuck. The Canucks' fan forum is buzzing with reactions and opinions, of their new player and what he will bring to the team.

No matter which team landed the popular Swede, here's my question, "What made numerous General Managers around the league chase him for months?"

I don't think Sundin is a deal breaker or a Gretzky, but the length some teams were willing to go in order to get Sundin was awfully ridiculous. Of all the teams, the Canucks are the only which need not trade a top player with the arrival of Mats. Great positioning by Mike Gillis, and the Canucks won the battle. Can you imagine if we had to get rid of 2 of our best players to bring Sundin in - that's what the NY Rangers were willing to do.

No player, in my books, is worth restructuring mid-season. Sure, some teams would have taken a stab at Michael Jordan or Wayne Gretzky in their prime but there isn't and "I" in team, and that one player will never cut it.

The Rangers tried with Gretzky, and it was less than successful, with out the rest of the team creating the magic on the ice. The Wizards tried to spark a championship with MJ and it was an utter failure. The best exanple of restructuring and winning a championship immediately is the 2007-2008 Boston Celtics. And that was no one player signing - it was adding 2 additional superstars, numerous roll player and leadership.

I think the best fit for Sundin is with the Canucks, and its simply because he won't ruffle feathers. If it leads to a Stanly Cup, fantastic, but first let's hope he's a solid, healthy hockey player that can still SCORE!

Whether or not he'll perform, Ticket Sales are through the roof and if you're planning on going to a game, be ready to pay a premium. We've got another star in Vancouver - it still might be best to take a couple days and catch a road game.